Surveying the Merits and Drawbacks of GitHub Actions

Surveying the Merits and Drawbacks of GitHub Actions

Within the realm of continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools, GitHub Actions has emerged as a prominent contender. As with any technological innovation, it brings forth its own assortment of benefits and drawbacks. Let us plunge into the advantages and disadvantages of GitHub Actions and juxtapose them with those of its competitors.

Merits of GitHub Actions:

  1. Intrinsic Fusion with GitHub: GitHub Actions seamlessly melds with GitHub repositories, facilitating the establishment and administration of CI/CD workflows directly within your version control system.

  2. Adaptable Workflow Configuration: GitHub Actions allows for the creation of highly adaptable workflows through the utilization of YAML configuration files. This affords you the capability to delineate workflows for automating tasks such as testing, constructing, and deploying your applications with considerable ease.

  3. Extensive Array of Actions: The GitHub Marketplace presents a broad spectrum of pre-constructed actions contributed by the community, spanning various application scenarios. This expansive ecosystem empowers you to capitalize on existing actions or craft your own to align with your specific requirements.

  4. Scalability: GitHub Actions exhibits commendable scalability across diverse projects, whether you are engaged in a modest personal endeavor or tackling a sprawling enterprise application. You can execute workflows across distinct operating systems, virtual environments, and even on self-hosted runners, thereby augmenting your maneuverability.

  5. Real-time Insight: Through GitHub Actions, you receive instantaneous feedback concerning the status of your workflows directly within your pull requests and commits. This facilitates prompt identification and resolution of issues within your codebase.

Drawbacks of GitHub Actions:

  1. Complexity in Elaborate Workflows: Despite affording flexibility, devising intricate workflows replete with multiple steps and conditions can devolve into a convoluted endeavor, posing challenges in terms of maintenance, particularly for novices.

  2. Restrictions on Resources: GitHub Actions imposes certain constraints on resource utilization, including maximum execution time and available disk space. This may encumber workflows that necessitate extensive resources.

  3. Reliance on GitHub: Given GitHub Actions' close integration with GitHub, any disruptions or downtime encountered on the GitHub platform can impede your CI/CD workflows. This dependence engenders apprehensions regarding reliability and availability.

  4. Learning Curve: Despite boasting a user-friendly interface, attaining proficiency in GitHub Actions and comprehending its intricacies may necessitate a substantial investment of time and effort, particularly for individuals unaccustomed to CI/CD concepts or YAML syntax.

Comparative Analysis with Competitors:

  1. GitLab CI/CD: GitLab CI/CD mirrors GitHub Actions' functionality with its YAML-based configuration and native integration within the GitLab platform. While GitHub Actions excels in its seamless GitHub integration, GitLab CI/CD proffers a more comprehensive suite of project management features.

  2. Travis CI: Renowned for its simplicity and user-friendliness, Travis CI caters admirably to open-source projects. However, GitHub Actions outshines it in terms of flexibility, scalability, and integration with GitHub repositories.

  3. CircleCI: Distinguished for its potent automation capabilities and extensive integrations, CircleCI furnishes robust CI/CD solutions. Nevertheless, GitHub Actions distinguishes itself with its native GitHub integration and expansive array of actions.

Now, let's dive into creating a GitHub action. Here is a detailed tutorial explaining how to set up GitHub Actions for a MERN (MongoDB, Express.js, React.js, Node.js) project, focusing on a calendar application. We will guide you through setting up continuous integration (CI) to test your application code.

Remember, this is just a demo to give you an idea. A more comprehensive tutorial can be provided upon demand. let me know it in the comments


  • Fundamental proficiency in Git and GitHub.

  • A MERN stack project (in this instance, a calendar application).

Step 1: Configuration of GitHub Actions

  1. Navigate to the GitHub repository pertaining to the calendar application.

  2. Access the "Actions" tab.

  3. Initiate the setup process by clicking on the green button labeled "Set up a workflow yourself".

Step 2: Formulation of Workflow YAML File

Substitute the contents of the autogenerated YAML file with the following:

name: CI

      - main
      - main

    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

      - name: Check Out Repository
        uses: actions/checkout@v2

      - name: Utilize Node.js
        uses: actions/setup-node@v2
          node-version: 14.x

      - name: Install Dependencies
        run: npm install

      - name: Execute Tests
        run: npm test

Step 3: Preservation and Commitment

Save the alterations made to the YAML file and commit them to the main branch.

Step 4: Validation

Initiate a new commit or pull request to trigger the GitHub Actions workflow. Subsequently, navigate to the "Actions" tab on your GitHub repository to monitor the execution of the workflow.


  • This workflow is activated upon every push to the main branch and every pull request aimed at the main branch.

  • It operates on the latest version of Ubuntu.

  • It entails the checkout of the repository, establishment of the Node.js environment (version 14.x in this instance), installation of project dependencies via npm, and eventual execution of tests using npm test.


  • The Node.js version or any other configuration within the YAML file can be tailored to align with the requisites of your project.

  • Supplementary steps can be incorporated for building, deploying, or executing any other actions deemed necessary within your CI pipeline.

This configuration guarantees that every modification made to your calendar application undergoes automated testing whenever a push to the main branch is effected or a pull request is initiated, thereby aiding in the preservation of code quality and stability throughout the developmental phase.

In summation, GitHub Actions proffers a compelling mechanism for automating CI/CD workflows within the GitHub milieu. Its seamless integration, adaptability, and extensive community backing render it a favored choice for myriad development teams. Nevertheless, users ought to exercise caution regarding its intricacy in elaborate workflows and its reliance on the GitHub platform. Ultimately, the decision between GitHub Actions and its counterparts hinges upon the specific exigencies and preferences governing your project.

Did you find this article valuable?

Support Ahammad kabeer by becoming a sponsor. Any amount is appreciated!